Diff for "Eicta041202En"

Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 4: Line 4:
[ [:SwpateictaEn: EICTA]
| [:Patents4InnovationEn: Patents4Innovation]
| [http://swpat.ffii.org/analyse/kopie/index.en.html Copyright Too Weak?]
| [:SwpatcninoEn: News]
[ [[SwpateictaEn| EICTA]]
| [[Patents4InnovationEn| Patents4Innovation]]
| [[http://swpat.ffii.org/analyse/kopie/index.en.html|Copyright Too Weak?]]
| [[SwpatcninoEn| News]]
Line 13: Line 13:
EICTA published an English translation of an article originally [http://www.openmagazine.nl/node/view/124 published in Dutch] by [http://www.openmagazine.nl OpenMagazine]. EICTA published an English translation of an article originally [[http://www.openmagazine.nl/node/view/124|published in Dutch]] by [[http://www.openmagazine.nl|OpenMagazine]].
Line 15: Line 15:
The only trace left [http://www.google.de/search?q=cache:NCGTn0HBn4EJ:www.patents4innovation.org/+brinkhorst+computer+programs+patentable+europe&hl=de&client=firefox-a is a Google cache of a page with a (non-working) link] to that page. The only trace left [[http://www.google.de/search?q=cache:NCGTn0HBn4EJ:www.patents4innovation.org/+brinkhorst+computer+programs+patentable+europe&hl=de&client=firefox-a|is a Google cache of a page with a (non-working) link]] to that page.
Line 17: Line 17:
!OpenMagazine is published under [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd-nc/1.0/ this Creative Commons license], which !OpenMagazine is published under [[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd-nc/1.0/|this Creative Commons license]], which
Line 24: Line 24:
We have confirmed with an editor of !OpenMagazine that EICTA did not ask for permission to be relieved of any of these requirements. Additionally, the same issue of !OpenMagazine also published a [http://www.openmagazine.nl/node/view/125 reaction] (in Dutch) by [:ReinierBakelsEn: Reinier Bakels], in which he, among others, corrected some factual errors in Brinkhorst's text. None of those corrections are mentioned or referred to by EICTA either. We have confirmed with an editor of !OpenMagazine that EICTA did not ask for permission to be relieved of any of these requirements. Additionally, the same issue of !OpenMagazine also published a [[http://www.openmagazine.nl/node/view/125|reaction]] (in Dutch) by [[ReinierBakelsEn| Reinier Bakels]], in which he, among others, corrected some factual errors in Brinkhorst's text. None of those corrections are mentioned or referred to by EICTA either.
Line 35: Line 35:
 * 2004-12-02 NL [:LaurensJanBrinkhorstEn: Brinkhorst] on [:Patents4InnovationEn: P4I]: "Computer Programs are not patentable in Europe"  * 2004-12-02 NL [[LaurensJanBrinkhorstEn| Brinkhorst]] on [[Patents4InnovationEn| P4I]]: "Computer Programs are not patentable in Europe"

--> [ EICTA | Patents4Innovation | Copyright Too Weak? | News ]


Overview

EICTA published an English translation of an article originally published in Dutch by OpenMagazine.

The only trace left is a Google cache of a page with a (non-working) link to that page.

OpenMagazine is published under this Creative Commons license, which

  • requires attribution (none is given in the EICTA article)
  • forbids derivative works (a translation is a derivative work according to the license)
  • requires the license terms of the text to be made known to readers (this is not done on the EICTA site)
  • forbids commercial use (as patents4innovation is a corporate lobbying site, this part of the license could be infringed as well)

We have confirmed with an editor of OpenMagazine that EICTA did not ask for permission to be relieved of any of these requirements. Additionally, the same issue of OpenMagazine also published a reaction (in Dutch) by Reinier Bakels, in which he, among others, corrected some factual errors in Brinkhorst's text. None of those corrections are mentioned or referred to by EICTA either.

Comments

Jonas Maebe

It is strange that an organisation which claims to be very much in favour of strong intellectual property protection, acts entirely disrespectful as far as other people's intellectual achievements are concerned. Maybe the reason they lobby so heavily for software patents and claim that copyright cannot protect anything, stems from the fact that they simply do not understand that copyright covers much more than literal copies. This incident perfectly illustrates how "rewriting a copyrighted work into something different that still means the same" is still an act of copyright infringement.

Article

  • 2004-12-02 NL Brinkhorst on P4I: "Computer Programs are not patentable in Europe"

Hosting sponsored by Netgate and Init Seven AG